无所住

去了墙外，要麻烦愿意继续看到我的成长的朋友们改变下阅读习惯，请将亲爱的们的邮件地址输入下面的方框中，点击更下面的subscribe，并根据提示操作（会弹出来一个对话框，请输入你所看到的字符，提交；然后请进入你自己的邮箱，打开那封发件人为FeedBurner Email Subscriptions的信，点击里面唯一的有效链接地址，就ok 了）。以后，新写的博文将通过电子邮件的方式发给亲爱的们。如果觉得复杂，也可将发邮件告诉我（hanmingbaobao@hotmail.com）你计划用来接收新博客的邮箱:)

当然，如果亲爱的你也在墙外就不需要了，往http://sword2011.blogspot.com

为了写我所爱的其实并不敏感的文，不得已要离开这里，见谅。

从前的文章仍然留在这里，那边，是一片新土壤。

抱歉，爱你们。

今夜无人入眠。相信在我现在所在的酒店，这样的人不在少数。有人关心即将成立的新机构的新主人，有人关心三十年河东是不是提早终结了，有人喝大了给本不该骚扰的人打电话，有人烦恼朝令夕改的消防条例又多了气象局作伴。

站队很重要。比如改革开放初期就进来布局的那些外企，比如对网路纯洁及时投诚的那些IT公司，比如公职的生存。

公职，在他们看来是如此的压力重重，以致于非要全力往上爬才能实现他们的人生价值。或许也因如此的压力重重，他们在某些场合看起来如此兴奋，如此强人所难，如此让人作呕。

像我这么冷淡的人，竟然因为比较礼貌而受人误解，被灌酒到吐也就罢了，还要出去被夜生活，他们是疯了吗？可惜懦弱如我，只有反复推托，反复应付着诸如你好像我一个好友之类的无稽之谈，夹杂着在我看来是猥琐与恶心的语气。她们说，十官九色。我想知道：是否她们也是从这般的不堪中走到现在？

那些人的酒气喷在你顽强微笑的脸上，我和妓女有什么不同呢？

那些迎来送往酒量一级能说会道和谁都自然熟的女生，青春真的能换明天吗？

我想我永远都做不到领导所喜欢的样子，成不了所谓场面上的人，站不到对的队，伤心之余，又是十万分的庆幸：明后天都有陈医生做挡箭牌，但愿顺利躲开那些令人难堪的话语。

　　　　　　微博上的人越来越多，博客上的人越来越少
　　　　认识网络的官员越来越多，用大脑说话的人越来越少
　　　　　　　　敏感词越来越多，成功发文的概率越来越少
　　　　　blogbus死机越来越多，墙内的空间越来越少

　　　　　　　　　　　　新地儿装修中。
　　　　如有一日突然打不开这里，有劳发信hanmingbaobao@hotmail.com
　　　　　又或，你先来信留个底，换地儿了给发英雄帖

作为对美国经济不满的一部分，哈佛的学生发起了这场小规模抗议活动，给当代最厉害的经济学家曼昆发公开信，并抵制上他的课。以上是大陆媒体的解读。

实际上，这封公开信只是很客观地讨论了在大学里开设经济学相关课程应当海纳百川的建议，并稍稍对曼昆个人的派别偏好表达些许不满。尽管在最后学生们也提到了，鉴于哈佛毕业生对于美国乃至世界经济的重要作用，学校有必要为学生提供更为开阔和批判性的视野，不然就会再次重蹈过去5年糟糕经济状况的覆辙。但还不足以让媒体将这件事情拔高到这么政治的层面。

以下原文：

Wednesday November 2, 2011

Dear Professor Mankiw—

Today, we are walking out of your class, Economics 10, in order to express our discontent with the bias inherent in this introductory economics course. We are deeply concerned about the way that this bias affects students, the University, and our greater society.

As Harvard undergraduates, we enrolled in Economics 10 hoping to gain a broad and introductory foundation of economic theory that would assist us in our various intellectual pursuits and diverse disciplines, which range from Economics, to Government, to Environmental Sciences and Public Policy, and beyond. Instead, we found a course that espouses a specific—and limited—view of economics that we believe perpetuates problematic and inefficient systems of economic inequality in our society today.

A legitimate academic study of economics must include a critical discussion of both the benefits and flaws of different economic simplifying models. As your class does not include primary sources and rarely features articles from academic journals, we have very little access to alternative approaches to economics. There is no justification for presenting Adam Smith’s economic theories as more fundamental or basic than, for example, Keynesian theory.

Care in presenting an unbiased perspective on economics is particularly important for an introductory course of 700 students that nominally provides a sound foundation for further study in economics. Many Harvard students do not have the ability to opt out of Economics 10. This class is required for Economics and Environmental Science and Public Policy concentrators, while Social Studies concentrators must take an introductory economics course—and the only other eligible class, Professor Steven Margolin’s class Critical Perspectives on Economics, is only offered every other year (and not this year).  Many other students simply desire an analytic understanding of economics as part of a quality liberal arts education. Furthermore, Economics 10 makes it difficult for subsequent economics courses to teach effectively as it offers only one heavily skewed perspective rather than a solid grounding on which other courses can expand. Students should not be expected to avoid this class—or the whole discipline of economics—as a method of expressing discontent.

Harvard graduates play major roles in the financial institutions and in shaping public policy around the world. If Harvard fails to equip its students with a broad and critical understanding of economics, their actions are likely to harm the global financial system. The last five years of economic turmoil have been proof enough of this.

We are walking out today to join a Boston-wide march protesting the corporatization of higher education as part of the global Occupy movement. Since the biased nature of Economics 10 contributes to and symbolizes the increasing economic inequality in America, we are walking out of your class today both to protest your inadequate discussion of basic economic theory and to lend our support to a movement that is changing American discourse on economic injustice. Professor Mankiw, we ask that you take our concerns and our walk-out seriously.

Sincerely,

Concerned students of Economics 10

“屁股决定脑袋”是进入公职之后常常听到的话，有时是用来解释为何没有路见不平拔刀相助，有时也作为一项政策或者决定的逻辑补充，有时，这样的自我开脱甚至会发生在芝麻绿豆的事情上。

Q上签名说，我一直在浪费时间。引来同事的关怀，他们觉得每日这般已经十分忙碌，也不理解我所谓的缺乏进步指的是什么。

屁股会越做越大，越来越有惯性，把你的身子牢牢地捆绑在椅子上，不想动弹，拒绝改变，害怕挑战。但是，屁股并没有决定了脑袋，而是当事人一早就割舍了脑袋。